Governments Should Invest as Much in the Arts as They Do in the Military

abril 26, 2022 Postar um comentário

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thanks for using the timer - this avant-garde tool can estimate your performance and suggest more do questions. We have subscribed you lot to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

nosotros will option new questions that lucifer your level based on your Timer History

Runway
Your Progress

every calendar week, nosotros'll transport yous an estimated GRE score based on your operation

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable exercise questions and articles delivered to your e-mail? No problem, unsubscribe hither.

Apr 26

This Magoosh One Month GRE Written report Schedule is designed for those of you who are wondering how to written report for the GRE in a short menses of time on your own. The key to studying for the GRE in a month is to commit yourself to an established plan.
Apr 27

The Target Test Prep GRE course is a unique, comprehensive online course that combines innovative software with fourth dimension-tested written report methods to fix you for the rigors of the GRE.
Apr 28

Getting your GRE prep started on the right foot volition assistance set yous up for success on examination day. For strategies and tips on maximizing your GRE performance, delight make sure to subscribe to our new GRE YouTube aqueduct.
May 03

Strategies and techniques for budgeted featured GRE topics, 1-hour of live, online instruction. Tuesday, May 3rd at five:00 PM PT
May 04

Run into some of our meridian instructors while edifice your skills with high-yield topics. You'll larn how to utilise those skills to examination questions, receive guidance for building your personal study plan, and more.

Director

Manager

Joined: 17 February 2015

Posts: 104

Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in [#permalink] 03 May 2015, 03:49

Governments should invest as much in the arts as they exercise in the military.

The speaker contends that the arts should be funded as much every bit the military. I concede that the arts accept a potential to reform any country economy. Beyond this concession I detect the speaker'south assertion indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint. In fact, following the speaker's advice would actually brand totally generalization nigh the comparing.

Outset, the main reason for my key disagreement with the speaker's exclamation is that the military of any nation is one of the nearly prevail demand in electric current scenario, because each nation desire to conquer other, and the reason behind acquisition might be justifiable or unjustifiable. For instance, at present'due south days all country are fighting against terrorism, for this fight nosotros need a highly trained military machine forces who can combat with these terrorists, this is only done by supporting more and more to the country military instead of the arts.

Second, the main reason for my disagreement is lies in a empirical show that when any state legislators get together in their assembly, they mainly focus on the civilian security instead of whatever other things. For instance, one of the most powerful of the world the USA has been spending millions of dollars on their land noncombatant safety, not only the U.s., but also other powerful countries are likewise spending millions of dollars for this work.

Finally, some people argue that the arts is weapon that can generate numbers of employment in any land where it will be supported by the government, just in reality the artists works are not dependable on the regime money. Moreover, the arts can grow independently, because the roots of the arts lie deep in civilization instead of whatsoever kinds of supports.

In sum, I hold that the authorities should mainly focus on one of the most paramount need that is the armed services of their nation, because for stability or footstep can abound more creative arts and artists. Furthermore, the arts can sustain individually without any kind of assistance, and so therefore the government primarily should focus on the military needs.

Retired Moderator

Joined: 07 Jun 2014

Posts: 4805

GRE 1: Q167 V156

Verified score

WE:Business Development (Free energy and Utilities)

Re: Outset outcome essay, pls evaluate ........... [#permalink] 03 May 2015, 05:09

Some other response:

Governments should invest equally much in the arts as they do in the military.

The consequence here has raised a number of questions in countries around the world. Information technology is prevalent in today's world and has raised serious doubts. Arts or military might? Which of the ii defines a nation. A lot of thought has to be put into this upshot, as both play a vital part in the way the lodge progresses.

Arts are the defining characteristics of a nation. They are symbolic of each country, they provide vital information about the existing traditions in a society. Art forms such as dance, literature, music , paintings are all an indispensable function of the social club. Admitting, military machine ability does play a vital role in securing a nation confronting strange and internal threats, simply providing bulk of the nations funding for war machine purposes is unjustified.

Art forms also share equal importance. All great nations take been recognized by their artistic works. Beethoven'south symphony, Leonardo Da Vinci's puzzling paintings, the delicate Indian trip the light fantastic toe traditions have left one and all awe struck. Arts mainly thrive on the appreciation that is given by the public. An artist does not need millions of dollars of funding for him to put upwardly a beautiful work of art. Money is not a motivational factor for arts, it is respect and appreciation that motivates an creative person to carry out his work with sheer determination.

War machine advancements require billions of dollars of investment each year from the government, however it would exist wrong to say that art forms crave an equivalent amount of funding. Simply completely ignoring arts all together might pb to a sharp decline in artistic endeavors. Some amount of promotional funding, and security in part of the regime has to be provided. Museums, exhibitions and other promotional events take to be initiated by the government to ensure that the artists are motivated to practice what they do all-time.

This does not mean the regime invest million dollars in arts, just some part of the government funding should be allotted for arts in case a day arises when one needs to revive an fine art grade which has lost all its value and which was once the essence of a particular tradition. Military machine advancements are of great importance in today's world and nation's need to invest a lot of money to ensure the safety of its citizens.

Thus although no large scale funding is required for art forms, only the government should continue aside some part of the tax payer'due south coin for arts, so that people can continue to enjoy the truthful essence of their homeland and culture, which inturn would motivate various artists to continue their work.
_________________

Sandy
If yous plant this post useful, please allow me know by pressing the Kudos Push

Try our free Online GRE Test

Intern

Joined: xv May 2015

Posts: 4

Re: First result essay, pls evaluate ........... [#permalink] 03 Jun 2015, 00:54

hello,
your essay is good, clear and precise. if you increase the length of the essay, yous might get more score. try to elaborate the examples a little more equally i read in the sample essays which scored v and 6. one more thing which is of import is the flow between the paragraphs, use furthermore, also, as said above etc. and besides y'all have written finally in the second concluding para and in the last para "in sum". the e-rater may cut your score for this. if you are writting your conclusion, in that para only write such words like in sum. u can also refer the magoosh for this

Intern

Joined: nineteen Aug 2016

Posts: 1

Re: Governments should invest as much in the arts equally they practise in [#permalink] xx Aug 2016, 01:thirteen

It is definitely truthful that investing in arts would bring more than glory to the particular country just information technology should not to be forgot that being safety should be the principal concern.

This world has already seen ii wars and after that no land wouldn't be taking risk of not developing their armed services or not investing in defense sector. It is kind of an anecdote but true that to protect creative person, they would exist seeing military assistance.

Investing more in arts could take been truthful in a sense when no country is investing in military anymore and all the nation are at aforementioned level. Only that is not the case in present and never that would exist in near future. For example simply 8 countries has got nuclear weapons in the entire world at present unless almost all capable countries couldn't develop their ain nuclear weapon they won't be happy. But the time when this equilibrium should arrive, countries like United states would start investing more in other type of weapon which are technologically great. And again every country would start racing for that. So being in an equilibrium state in military machine is a myth and every country would accept to invest in this.

On the contrary investing in military is tougher than investing in arts in sense of fiscal condition. Arts doesn't require that much of financial back up as much every bit military do. Military machine requires a lot of money to be invested in buying the weapons, doing research for developing own weapons merely arts doesn't require that much of money to be invested. And so there is non point of investing as much in arts as armed services. That implies if any land is capable plenty to invest in military successfully that could easily fund to promote arts of the country.

What I believe in truthful sense is war machine requires to be funded great by the authorities but arts doesn't crave that instead arts should exist promoted in every part of the order. It might require a little fund to promote these type of things but again that would be very modest equally compared to military fund. After when their paintings, music etc become famous around the world, the small amount of money which was invested, they would be bringing that money to India anyway.

At last a regime's primary concern should be of investing money in the armed services but on the aforementioned folio a pocket-size amount (1 or 2% of military) of fund should be given to arts to promote that.

Intern

Joined: 23 Jun 2018

Posts: one

Re: Governments should invest as much in the arts as they practice in [#permalink] 23 Jun 2018, 04:49

Can someone please requite an opinion most my essay? Thanks

It is hard to agree nigh what areas and sectors should governments invest their resources on. Many would say that is important to invest in research in this era of technology. Others might say that the first priority of the governments should be to provide skillful healthcare services. The writer of the text claims that the government should invest as much in the arts equally they do in the armed services. I would disagree with the recommendation made by the author. Although it is true that this kind of dilemma is ever dependent on the social and economical environs, investing in military must always be a superlative priority over the years.

As I said before, when claiming if the governments should invest their resource on arts or on military, one should always bear in listen the specific social and economical circumstances of that specific fourth dimension period. What was valid and true yesterday might not be today. Having said that, information technology is hard to imagine a time when investing in military was not a tiptop priority. Whether it was because we were at war or considering the danger of being at war was great, most governments around the earth take always investing much of their resources in military.

If nosotros consider the fourth dimension we alive in, we probably would agree that armed forces is a acme priority. The dangers posed by terrorism are enormous, and countries must protect their citizens. In addition, global warming might become also a national security issue, with countries fighting for the possession of vital resources, such every bit water. Is it investing in art as important as investing in military? I do non agree with it. To tackle the nearly of import challenges that we face today and volition face in future, countries volition need to maintain or develop a good national security arrangement.

It is absolutely true that arts have the power to shape and define the civilization and the society of a country. When watching the picture "The Monuments Men", one will exist overwhelmed by how important it was to avert the devastation of certain creative masterpieces, for the revival of the countries after the 2nd Earth War. Nevertheless, arts is something that tin can be run and supported more easily past private agents. Arts can be a very profitable business, and therefore more people volition be willing to invest in information technology. On the other paw, not many people volition be interested in investing in war machine every bit the financial returns are small-scale.

To sum upward, although arts can take a very potent impact on lodge, I do not agree with the statement that governments should invest as much in arts as they practise in the military. Firstly, countries will require a good armed services in lodge to tackle the well-nigh proeminent challenges that they face. Secondly, as few people are willing to invest in military machine, equally it is not a very assisting concern, the governments should step up and provide national security services.

Intern

Joined: 17 Apr 2018

Posts: ii

Re: Governments should invest as much in the arts equally they do in [#permalink] 28 Jun 2018, 22:25

Fine art is a cultural heritage of a country, that must be protected and encouraged in order to revere our past generations and to sustain information technology for futurity generations to cherish the cultural uniqueness. Art comes in many forms dance,monuments, paintings,music besides as language.Whereas Military is entirely different responsibility of a state,infact sustenance of art is also ensured past armed forces.So writer's take to funding art as military doesn't make a cogent case,rather this statement is rife with flaws and bad comparing.

I of the major disconnect the author makes here is comparing of funds to war machine and arts.Funding of military is large and mostly capital machinery(guns,ship and planes) and salaries to servicemen.Typical budget of armed services is several hundred billion dollars where as Funding of arts cannot be equated to military'south.Moreover,Why huge funding is required for Arts? Restoration activities,programs to encourage classical dance and music , and languages only requires small fraction of funding

Also,The funding of arts and military is country specific and highly conditional.So , we cannot generalize this to every state.Imagine a developing country fraught with insurgency, in this case with limited resouces the need of the hour would exist to safeguard the nation from external ans well equally internal threats.

Having said that, I am not suggesting that Art should not be funded, its our cultural heritage and must be looked subsequently.Sustenance of arts in whatever country doesn't just needs funds from government just encouragement and support programs where new generation is inspired to learn arts. In fact we have numerous artists who fabricated it big on all arenas of arts be it painting,classical music,theaters , classical dances etc.Therefore Authorities should formulate defended institution to monitor and inspire the growth of arts in the country apart from merely funding it.

Verbal Expert

Joined: xviii Apr 2015

Posts: 20793

Re: Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in [#permalink] 04 Jul 2018, 01:fifteen

francisconobre wrote:

Tin can someone delight give an opinion about my essay? Thank you

It is hard to agree near what areas and sectors should governments invest their resources on. Many would say that is important to invest in research in this era of technology. Others might say that the offset priority of the governments should be to provide good healthcare services. The author of the text claims that the government should invest every bit much in the arts as they do in the military. I would disagree with the recommendation made past the author. Although it is true that this kind of dilemma is e'er dependent on the social and economic environs, investing in war machine must ever be a top priority over the years.

As I said before, when claiming if the governments should invest their resources on arts or on armed forces, i should e'er bear in mind the specific social and economical circumstances of that specific time menstruum. What was valid and true yesterday might non exist today. Having said that, it is hard to imagine a time when investing in armed services was non a top priority. Whether it was because nosotros were at state of war or because the danger of existence at state of war was great, most governments effectually the world accept always investing much of their resource in military.

If we consider the time we live in, nosotros probably would agree that military is a top priority. The dangers posed by terrorism are enormous, and countries must protect their citizens. In improver, global warming might become also a national security outcome, with countries fighting for the possession of vital resources, such as water. Is it investing in art as important every bit investing in military? I exercise not agree with it. To tackle the nigh important challenges that we face up today and will face in future, countries will demand to maintain or develop a proficient national security organisation.

It is absolutely true that arts have the power to shape and define the culture and the society of a state. When watching the picture "The Monuments Men", one will be overwhelmed by how important it was to avoid the devastation of certain artistic masterpieces, for the revival of the countries after the second World War. Withal, arts is something that tin can be run and supported more easily by private agents. Arts can be a very profitable business organisation, and therefore more people volition be willing to invest in it. On the other manus, not many people will be interested in investing in military machine equally the financial returns are small.

To sum up, although arts can have a very strong bear on on society, I do non concur with the statement that governments should invest as much in arts as they do in the military. Firstly, countries volition require a good military in lodge to tackle the near proeminent challenges that they face up. Secondly, equally few people are willing to invest in military, as it is not a very profitable business, the governments should step upwardly and provide national security services.

It is good yet non fully address the upshot.

https://greprepclub.com/forum/greprepcl ... -3426.html

See here for strategy